中德应用型高校本科培养方案之比较

——以工业设计专业为例

打开文本图片集

中图分类号：G642;G649.3/.7 文献标识码：A 文章编号：2095-6916（2025）16-0134-04

A Comparison of Undergraduate Training Programs Between Chinese and German Applied Universities

—ACase Study of Industrial Design Majors Zhang Xinyuan

（Schoolof Vocational Education，Tianjin Universityof TechnologyandEducation，Tianjin ）

Abstract：Bycomparingundergraduate trainingprogramsforindustrialdesigbetween ChineseandGermanapplieduniversitisacross fouraspects：talent-cultivationgoals，coursestructures，teaching methods，andassssentappoaces，thispaperfindsthatGeran programsemphasize“inovation-driven”learingwithcorecourses，interdiscipinarycolaboration，real-projecttraining，anddiverse assessmentsfocusingonpractic.Incontrast，Chineseprogramshiglight“technicalaplication”，dominatedbytheoreticalrequired courses.Theirpracticalcompoentsfeatureliitedindustrycolaboration，relyontraditionallectures，andusesinglesubjectnt basedonexamsandasigentsAcoringlyitisproposedthatChinseapliedundergauateidustrialdesigneducationatainits engineringeducationstrengthswhiledrawingonGerman experience.Specificmeasuresincludereconstructingan“innovation-driven” trainingobjective，developingacuriculumsystemthatcombinesmodularcourseswitheal-projecttraining，shftingteachingmethods towardscapabilitydevelopment，andimplementingdiverseanddyamicasessmentsThegoalistocultivate“Tshapeddesigers”wo possessbothdeeptechnicalexpertiseandinovationabity，threbyfacilitingthtransfomationandupgradingofindustrldesign education in the new engineering context.

Keywords：industrial design education; applied university； training program；industrial design

《中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和2035年远景目标纲要》明确指出，工业设计应该以服务制造业高质量发展为导向，聚焦提高产业创新力，向专业化和价值链高端延伸[1]

德国是现代工业设计的发源地。（剩余4601字）