科研人员信用评价制度的逻辑、困境与法治路径

  • 打印
  • 收藏
收藏成功

中图分类号:G311;D922 文献标识码:A doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2272.202505089

The Logic,Dilemma and Ruleof Law Path of the Credit Evaluation System forScientificResearchers

Li Xuanyi (School of Law,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 5looo6,China)

Abstract: Credit evaluation of researchers is a key mechanism in the governance of scientific research projects.However,constrained by the traditional stance of the scientific research administrative system,current legislation drives credit evaluation reform through a power-centric mindset and departmental self-interest.This results in systemic deficiencies,including ambiguous positioning of scientific power,inadequate protection of researchers rights,and insufficient realization of scientific responsibilities,severely undermining the intended efficacy of the credit evaluation system.To unlock the institutional value of credit evaluation,this study advocates reshaping its value orientation through an intersubjectivity thinking paradigm.We propose a systematic optimization framework: ① Power allocation level:Clarify the institutional positioning of scientific power and promote its collaborative operation; ② (204号 Rights safeguarding level: Enhance due process in evaluations,strengthen the validity of evaluation outcomes,and improve redress mechanisms; ③ responsibility realization level:Design evaluation metrics based on scientific responsibilities and optimize credit rehabilitation mechanisms to reinforce responsibility incentives.This research provides theoretical foundations and practical guidance for establishinga scientific,equitable,and effective research credit evaluation system.

Key Words:Credit Evaluation; Incentives for Trustworthiness;Governance of Scientific Research Projects;Scientific Research Trust;Research Credits

0 引言

作为科研诚信客观化、制度化的重要产物,科研人员信用评价是一种有效的规制方式。(剩余14799字)

monitor
客服机器人