“货拉拉跳车案”中不作为犯罪的作为义务分析

中图分类号：D924.3 文献标识码：A 文章编号：2095-6916(2025)23-0093-05

An Analysis of the Duty to Act in Crime of Omission in the “Huolala Passenger Jump Case"

Weng Jiajun (Guizhou Universityof Finance and Economics,Guiyang550025)

Abstract:Injudicialpractice，thedeterminationofon-typicalomisioncrimefaesotheoreticalandpracticaldiffulties，and judicialauthoritieseibitcogitivebiasesindefiingtesopeofteguarantor'sbligation.Taking the“HuolalaPassngerJupCase asanexample,thissudyarguesthatjudicialuthoriseedinecogingtediver'sdmaneovrtheveiclespace,filingtofuly considerthelimatiosofsuchdominance，asthdriverasnottesolecontrolerofthespace.Meanhile，judicialauthorisdidnot adequatelyaccoutfortepassenger’sabilitytocontrotherobehavior，basedontheteoryofselfresposibilteiskflowleading tothepaseger'seathouedwitintedomainoftheirocotrolndtustepassgershouldbeartheprimaryesposibilityBy doptingasubstantivedichtomytopreciselyanalyethguarantor’sbligationtisstudylarfsthereasoableboundarisofsuchoblgationaistpoidetreticaleereefojudicadjudicatinsiasvodasobleepasioflabilitau blereferencesforteteoreticaldisssonandjudicialpracticeofontyicalomissorieandandcotrutetochevingfai and reasonableness in judicial decisions as well as the modesty of criminal law.

Keywords:non-typical omission crime；duty to act;“Huolala Passenger Jump Case”

近年来，“货拉拉跳车案”引发社会舆论与刑法学界的广泛关注与激烈讨论。（剩余8094字）