单孔与多孔机器人辅助肺癌根治术的疗效对比研究

打开文本图片集

中图分类号 R734.2 文献标识码 A 文章编号 2096-7721（2025）07-1203-05

AbstractObjective：Tocomparetheeficacyof single-ortandmulti-portrobot-assistedradicalresectionforlungcancer. Methods：Clinicaldataof9patientshounderenrobot-asistedradicalresetionforlungcanceatteFstAfliatedHospitalof XiamenUniversityfromOctober022 toOctoberO24wereretrospectivelyanalyzed.Patientsweredividedintothesingle-portgroup 0 n =57）andteulti-tgroup（n=72）asedoeumberofsugicalots，fllwedbypropensityorematchng（SM）.Peatie indicators，titta Results：Befor，ignifintdifrencseistedinge，BMmaiurdmeteratholgicaltyendsoistoy P <0.05）. After PSM，50 patients were included in each group， withno significant diference in baseline characteristics （ Pγ 0.05）. The multi-port group hadlongelngthofospiaygritraoativelodl，ndgreatrosopeatidageuetanengotop 0 P <0.05）.Howe，oiicantdferenesinatieti，lobctouratio，lhdedetiti，ageatiod numberoflmphodesdisecedwerefoundetwntetwogroups （POO5）.Distancesfrommargintotumorandiitialnegativeargin rates of the two groups were comparable （ P>0.05 ）. The multi-port group had higher Visual Analog Scale （VAS） scores on postoperative days 1，3，7，and 14 than the single-port group （ P <0.05）. Diffrences in complication rates were not statistically significant between the two groups （P>0.05） . Conclusion： Both single-port andmulti-port robot-asistedradical lung cancer surgerydemonstrate good safetyand feasibility， but the single-port robotic approach is more conducive to postoperative recovery and reduces postoperative pain.

Key WordsRadicalResectioofLungCancer;RobotasistdSurgery;SingleortLaparospicSurgery;Multi-ortLaparoopcurgey

肺癌作为全球范围内发病率和死亡率较高的恶性肿瘤之一，其治疗方式的选择直接影响患者预后。（剩余8845字）