两岸物流术语标准对照分析及共通对策研究

打开文本图片集

Abstract：Thispaper focusesonthestandardizationofcross-Straitlogistics terminologyandconductsacomparative analysisofdiferencesiterminologynames，Englishtranslations，definitions，andemergingfeldsbetweentheinese mainland'sGB/354-，LogisticsterminologyndTaiwanregion'sCN3816-1997，Glossaryoftermsforical distribution.ThestudyfindsthatthediferencesinterminologybetweenthetwosidesoftheStraitstemfromhistorical separation，developmental stages，andthecultural background.For instance，terminologyinthe Chinese mainland emphasizes functionalityand systematicity，while terminology in the Taiwanregion tend toadopt more colloquial expressons.These discrepancies may hinderthecross-Straitlogisticscooperationand professional exchanges.Therefore， the paper proposes measures suchasenhancing communicationandcollaboration，establishingaterminologycomparison platform，anddevelopingcommonstandards，imingtopromotethestandardized integrationofcross-Straitlogistics terminology，educe technicalbarriers，mproveregionallogisticsfciency，andfacilitateoordinatedeconomcand trade development on both sides of the Taiwan Strait.

Keywords：both sides of the Taiwan Strait;logistics terms;standard comparison;connectivity

0 引言

在《告台湾同胞书》发表40周年纪念会上，习近平总书记提出“两岸要应通尽通[1]，提升经贸合作畅通、基础设施联通、能源资源互通、行业标准共通”的“新四通”重要主张。（剩余4670字）