经典运动训练分期理论的争议焦点、应用局限及发展路向

打开文本图片集

中图分类号：G808.12 文献标识码：A 文章编号：1007-323X（2025）06-0081-11

Controversial lssues， Application Limitations and Developmental Trajectory of Sports Training Periodization Theory

Rui’， Zan’， （1.TianjinUniversityofSportShoolofSportsTiing，Tianj3O617，hina;2QinhuangdaoTaingCenterGeneralAdmistratiof Sport of China，Qinhuangdao O66OO4，China）

Abstract： This study employs literature review， expert interviews and logical analysis to systematically review and objectively evaluate relevant literature on the classical training periodization theory， aiming to uncover controversial issues and application limitations in its developmental trajectory and propose corresponding solutions. The findings indicate that the controversies surrounding the classical periodization theory of athletic training center on the empirical validity of its theoretical foundations，its applicability to team sports and emerging disciplines， its guidance for commercialization and multi-competition training demands， as well as the individualization and precision of load arrangements. The application limitations are primarily reflected in insufficient validity of practical guidance，limited sport-specific adaptability，suboptimal applicability of phase division， and the complexity of regulating training load adaptation. To address these challenges，this study proposes the following solutions： strengthening theoretical and empirical validity through multidisciplinary research advancements，conducting in-depth studies driven by cluster-based characteristics of sports，balancing trainingand competition objectivesvia flexible phase periodization， and exploring technology-driven individualized training load regulation.

Keywords： sports training periodization theory; controversial issues; application limitations： developmental trajectory

经典运动训练分期理论（以下简称“经典分期理论”）以竞技状态发展的规律性（时相性）为自然基础，将完整的训练大周期划分为准备期、比赛期和过渡期三个训练周期，使运动员能够在重大赛事中达到竞技状态的运动训练理论体系[1]。（剩余21214字）