NALIRIFOX方案一线治疗转移性胰腺癌的经济学评价

  • 打印
  • 收藏
收藏成功


打开文本图片集

中图分类号 R956;R979.1 文献标志码A 文章编号 1001-0408(2025)21-2681-06

DOI 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.21.11

ABSTRACTOBJECTIVEFrom the perspectiveof China's health system,toevaluate theeconomiceficiencyof Irinotecan liposome+fluorouracil+calciumfolinate+oxaliplatin(NALIRIFOXregimen)versuspaclitaxel(albumin-bound)combinedwith gemcitabie(AGregimen)inthefirst-linetreatmentof metastaticpancreaticcancerMETODSAdynamicMarkovmodelwas constructedbasedonthedatafromtheNAPOLI3clinical trial,withacyeleperiodof28daysandasimulationtimelimitof 5 years.Incrementalcost-effectivenessratio(ICER)andquality-adjustedlifeyear(QALY)wereusedasthemodeloutputindicators. The willigness-to-pay(WTP)threshold wassetatthreetimes China’s2024percapita gross domesticproduct(GDP),and a discount rate of 5% wasadopted.A cost-utility analysis was conducted to analyze the economic eficiencyof the NALIRIFOX regimenomparedtotheAGregimen.Univariatesensitivityanalysisandprobabilisticsensitivityanalysis wereusedtoevaluate the robustness of the model results,and scenarioanalysis wasconducted byreducing thecostof irinotecan liposome by 60% and 70% 业 RESULTS The base-case analysis showed thatthe ICER of the NALIRIFOX regimen was 854 69.96 yuan/QALYcompared to the AG regimen,which was greater than the WTPthreshold(287 247yuan/QALY),indicating that theNALIRIFOXregimen was not economicallyeficient.Theunivariatesensitivityanalysisresultsindicatedthatthediscountrate,thecostofirinotecanliposome, theutityvalueofteprogresion-freesurvivalstateandteutilityvalueofthediseaseprogressionstateadasignificatpact onthe ICER.TheprobabilisticsensitivityanalysisresultsshowedthatundertheWTPthresholdofthisstudy,theNALIRIFOX regimenwas noteconomicallyeficientcompared withtheAGregimen.Thescenarioanalysis results indicatedthat whenthe price wasreduced by 70% ,the probability of the NALIRIFOX regimen being economically effcient compared with the AG regimen was 9.60% .CONCUSIONSFrom the perspectiveof China’s health system,when theWTP thresholdissetatthree times China’s2024 per capita GDP,the NALIRIFOX regimen isnot economically efficient in the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer,compared with theAG regimen.

KEYWORDSIrinotecan liposome;NALIRIFOX regimen;metastatic pancreatic cancer; first-line treatment; Markovmodel;pharmacoeconomics;cost-utilityanalysis

近年来,胰腺癌已成为全球范围内发病率和死亡率上升最快的恶性肿瘤之一。(剩余10804字)

monitor
客服机器人