同视野下荧光染色法和氢氧化钾湿片法在诊断浅部真菌感染中的敏感度对比

打开文本图片集

【摘要】目的：对比研究同视野下荧光染色法和氢氧化钾湿片法在诊断浅部真菌感染中的敏感度。方法：选取2019年1月—2021年6月间我院收治的浅部真菌感染患者200例作为研究对象，取材后分两份，分别采用荧光染色法和氢氧化钾湿片法进行诊断，比较两种方法下患者的诊断敏感度。结果：比较荧光染色法和氢氧化钾湿片法诊断不同类型浅部真菌感染的敏感性，均有荧光染色法优于氢氧化钾湿片法的情况，二者总的诊断敏感性分别为98.00%、91.50%，前者显著高于后者，比较有统计学差异（P

【关键词】荧光染色法；氢氧化钾湿片法；浅部真菌感染；敏感度

Comparison of sensitivity between fluorescence staining method and potassium hydroxide wet sheet method in the diagnosis of superficial fungal infection under the same visual field

SONG Shuwei

Department of Dermatology， Jingmen Second People’s Hospital， Jingmen， Hubei 448000， China

【Abstract】Objective： To compare the sensitivity of fluorescence staining method and potassium hydroxide wet sheet method in the diagnosis of superficial fungal infection under the same visual field.Methods：200 patients with superficial fungal infection from January 2019 to June 2021 in our hospital were selected as the research subjects.Then the samples were divided into two parts and diagnosed by fluorescence staining method and potassium hydroxide wet sheet method to compare the diagnostic sensitivity of patients under the two methods.Results：The sensitivity of fluorescence staining method and potassium hydroxide wet sheet method in the diagnosis of different types of superficial fungal infection was compared，and the fluorescence staining method was better than the potassium hydroxide wet sheet method.The total diagnostic sensitivity of the two methods were 98.00% and 91.50%，respectively，the former was significantly higher than the latter，with a statistical difference（P

【Key Words】Fluorescent staining method； Potassium hydroxide wet sheet method； Superficial fungal infection； Sensitivity

皮肤浅部真菌感染属于常见的皮肤病类型，最常见的致病菌包括马拉色菌、皮肤癣菌、念珠菌等，这些真菌侵犯患者皮肤、毛发、指（趾）甲的情况下，可诱发头癣、手足癣、体股癣、甲真菌病、花斑糠疹、皮肤黏膜念珠菌病以及一些难以辨认的皮肤癣[1]，而因上述真菌感染具有极强的传染性，不仅容易发生交叉感染，而且治愈后的复发率高[2]，严重影响患者的正常工作与生活。（剩余2845字）