《中图法》 “与其他学科的关系”类目研究

——基于类名规范与多模态验证的优化路径

打开文本图片集

Study on the “Relationship With Other Disciplines” Category in Chinese Library Classification： Optimization Pathways Based on Terminological Standardization and Multimodal Verification

Wu Weiguo

AbstractAddressing the issues ofambiguous category names，code conflicts，andfuzzy hierarchicallogic inthe “-05 Relationship withOther Disciplines”categoryofthe General Auxiliary Table in Chinese Library Clasification（CLC）， this study takes GB/T13745-2009 Classfication and Codes for Disciplinesas the benchmark and integrates the principleofunivocityinterminologywithdisciplineclassficationtheorytoconstructathree-tierclasificationmodelof Disciplinary branches，Interdisciplinaryfieldsand Trans-disciplinarity.Through stratified sampling，anambiguitycase library was constructed，atopological analysis was conductedonthe codingconflict network，the Kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the consistencyof indexing，and a mapping model was built based on SKOS.The empirical results show thatthe indexing consistencyof therevisedcategorysystem has been improved to O.82 （P<0.01），andtheindexing time has been reduced by 48.1% ，which verifies the effectiveness of the classification optimization.

Keywords Chinese Library Classification （ CLC ）.Sub-discipline.Interdisciplinary subject.Terminology.

Classification optimization. Classification mapping.

0 引言

《中国图书馆分类法》（简称《中图法》）作为我国文献分类的核心工具，其总论复分表中“-05与其他学科的关系”类目在长期应用中因学科发展和知识形态的变化暴露出类名歧义、编码冲突、逻辑层级模糊等问题，严重制约文献分类的准确性与一致性。（剩余6384字）