分剂量顺铂新辅助化疗用于肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者的疗效与安全性

打开文本图片集
ABSTRACT:ObjectiveTo compare the eficacyand safety of gemcitabinecombined with conventional-dose cisplatin ( 70mg/m2 ,day 2)versus split-dose cisplatin ( 35mg/m2 ,days 1 and 8)in neo-adjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).Methods The clinical data of 33 MIBC patients receiving(gemcitabine + cisplatin,GC)-based neoadjuvant chemotherapyintheDepartmentof Urologyof Xinhua Hospital,duringJan.202landAug.2024 wereretrospectivelyanalyzed, including 18(54.5% )patients treated with a conventional-dose regimen(GC group),and 15( 45.5% )patients treated with a split-dose egimen(GCs group).Theeficacy endpoints andincidence/severityof adversereactions werecompared between the two groups.ResultsBaseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups ( P>0.05 ).No significant differences were observed in the complete response rate(CR: 33.3% vs. 22.2% ),objective response rate(ORR: 66.7% vs. 61.1% ),or disease control rate(DCR: 80.0% vs. 88.9% )between the GCs and GC groups ( P>0.05) . The GCs group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of chemotherapy-related renal injury (6.7% vs. 38.9% P<0.05) ,while the occurrence of other adverseeventswascomparable between thetwogroups.Notably,theGCsgroup demonstrated significantlyattenuated nephrotoxicity,as evidenced by markedly smaller changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR: (4.5±4.7)%ν. S (18.0±11.8)%] and serum creatinine [SCr (5.7±5.6)%ν S. (20.2±19.5)%] compared to the GC group ( P<0.05) : ConclusionCompared with the conventional-dose regimen,the split-doseregimen maintains equivalent clinical eficacyof GC-based neoadjuvantchemotherapywhilesignificantlyreducingchemotherapy-relatednephrotoxicity,thereby providing MIBC patients with a safer therapeutic option.
KEY WORDS: muscl-einvasive bladdercancer;gemcitabine;cisplatin;neoadjuvantchemotherapy;split-dose administration; nephrotoxicity
摘要:目的比较吉西他滨联合常规剂量 (70mg/m2 ,第2天)或分剂量 (35mg/m2 ,第1、8天)顺铂方案在肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者新辅助化疗(NAC)中的疗效和安全性,为临床治疗决策提供参考。(剩余11613字)