生命终结选择立法的比较研究及中国借鉴

  • 打印
  • 收藏
收藏成功


打开文本图片集

[中图分类号]R-052 [文献标志码]A [文章编号]1001-8565(2025)10-1292-06

DOI:10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2025.10.09

Acomparative studyof legislationonend-of-lifeoptionsand lessonsfor China

ZHANG Yu,ZHANG Aiyan

(School of Criminal Justice,Shandong University of Political Science and Law, Jinan 25Ool4,China)

Abstract:With thecontinuous increasein the number of terminally ill patients,end-of-life options have becomeatopic of great concem in recent years.New Zealand’s End ofLife Choice Act and Korea’s Act on the Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients in Hospiceand Pallative Care orat theEndof Life,as representative legislations on euthanasia and death with dignity inrecent years,offer valuable references for China's legislationon end-of-life options.Compared witheuthanasia,which is prone to provoke legal and moral disputes, death withdignityhas abetterlegal andsocial foundation in China,andrelevant internationallegislationatthis stage is more mature and more referential.China can draw on relevant extrateritorial legislation,gradually promote the nationwide legislation on advance directivesand death with dignity based on clarifying the applicable standards of death with dignity and fully respecting patients’wishes,and explore the establishmentofa setof end-of-life legal system in line with the actual situation in China.

Keywords: euthanasia;death with dignity;advance directive;end-of-life;hospice care

对于生命终结的选择问题日益成为社会和法律关注的焦点。(剩余10237字)

monitor
客服机器人